Media Consolidation
Audio Recording by George Hahn, Illustration and Charts by Shira Seri Levi
The hottest product in tech is Bluesky, adding 1 million users a day since the election. CEO Jay Graber says the platform will never have ads, as ads are the road to “enshittification.” OK then. Ad-supported media, as a whole, is one of the least volatile businesses over the last century — accounting for 1.5% of GDP, and rarely straying from that number. Inside the sector, things are less tranquil (i.e., more chaotic). In an attention economy, money follows eyeballs. I believe we’ll see ads on Bluesky eventually, but for now, let’s talk about consolidation in the broader sector.
Burmese Pythons
Stories about Burmese pythons litter the local news in Florida. These snakes get big, really big. The serpents can grow to as much as 16 feet long and weigh hundreds of pounds. This presents a problem, as most owners are 5 foot 9 and soon discover their roommate situation is unworkable. Owners release the snakes into the Everglades, where they begin taking down alligators and deer. An alien species to the ecosystem of swamps, marshes, and mangrove forests, they’ve established themselves as the apex predator, and their population has exploded. The threat to Florida’s ecosystem is so great that mitigation efforts include employing full-time snake hunters and organizing state-sponsored hunting competitions. The winner of one competition earned $10,000 for nabbing 28 pythons — a drop in the bucket against a species that lays 30-plus eggs at a time and can reproduce asexually. After three decades, the U.S. Geological Survey concluded in 2023 that the python is winning.
Unlike the classic apex predator, which evolves alongside its prey, a nonnative apex predator arrives with such disruptive force that instead of dominating an ecosystem they transform it. Legacy media looks like Florida 30 years after the arrival of the Burmese python. A nonnative apex predator (digital) is out-hunting and out-reproducing the previous apex predator (legacy media).
Winner Take Most
Digitization lowers the barrier to entry, giving everyone access to everything. Initially, this looks like competition with extra protein, but over time it becomes consolidation on steroids, as digital ecosystems are winner-take-most/all based on who establishes leadership and access to the cheapest capital. Amazon registers 37% of e-commerce in the U.S., while its nine closest competitors (Walmart, Apple, Target, etc.) account for 23% combined. Nearly two-thirds of the world’s social media ads are sequestered to Meta. Since 2014, 90+% of internet searches are done on Google; the second-most-popular search engine, Microsoft’s Bing, commands less than 4% of the global search market. Three companies, Match Group, Bumble, and eHarmony control the entire digital dating marketplace. There is also consolidation on the customer end, where 10% of men get 80% to 90% of the dating opportunities.
In my industry, podcasting, the concentration is extreme even by digital standards. Of the 600k podcasts that produce content each week, the top 10 capture half the revenue. Put another way, to build a business in podcasting that pays people well and retains talent with high opportunity cost(s), you likely need to be in the top 0.1% by listenership. As a member of UCLA’s crew team, I was 3.5x more likely to be an Olympian than a successful podcast host.
Consolidation
In the late 1990s a wave of internet startups introduced a nonnative apex predator called streaming into the television media ecosystem. Thirty years later, most of those startups are dead, but their species has transformed the ecosystem such that streamers are the hunters and legacy media the prey.
To paraphrase what Ernest Hemingway said about bankruptcy, legacy media consolidated gradually, then suddenly. Here’s the gradual part: Over the past four decades, we’ve gone from an ecosystem where the number of companies controlling 90% of American media has gone from 50 to 6. Deregulation, financialization, and lax antitrust enforcement incentivized consolidation, but the shift from analog to digital made it a necessity, with the legacy media companies bulking up to keep from being devoured by digital. The sudden part happened last month, when Comcast announced it would spin off its cable assets — USA, CNBC, MSNBC, and E!, along with digital properties such as Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango — into a holding company called SpinCo.
Good Bank / Bad Bank
My first serious relationship in NYC was with a wonderful woman who suffered from bipolar disorder. We broke up for a simple reason: I did not know who I was going to wake up next to in the morning. When a company has a profitable but declining business (cable) and a growth business (streaming), investors don’t know who they’re living with. They don’t know how to value the asset, so they assign the multiple of its worst business to the entire company. The divestiture of assets in different life cycle stages provides more clarity to investors, and ultimately creates a smaller whole that’s greater than the sum of its parts.
The SpinCo cable assets generate about $7 billion per year in revenue. Meanwhile, Peacock, Comcast’s streaming service, reduced its losses from $565 million to $436 million (YoY). But more important for a growth asset, its revenue increased 82% (YoY) to $1.5 billion. I predicted SpinCo a year ago. I’ll make another prediction now: SpinCo will become a vehicle for acquiring other cable assets.
Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount are likely sellers, as both have profitable streaming units that are weighed down by legacy assets. When Max swung from a loss of $1.6 billion to a profit of $103 million (YoY), Warner Bros. Discovery saw its stock fall 12%. Paramount+ turned a $49 million profit in Q3, but Paramount’s market cap is down 19% this year. Disney, the only legacy player to see its stock increase after its streamer reached profitability, says it’s not selling its linear assets (ABC, FX, ESPN, etc.) as those networks are deeply integrated into Disney+.
Interestingly, all three companies are betting on bundling strategies, i.e. consolidating cable content in one app, without the cable infrastructure. Netflix, the nonnative apex predator, says it’s strong enough to hunt solo. I think Bob Iger is either wrong or he’s playing poker and holding out for a better price. If Disney sold its cable assets for $1, I believe it would be worth more within a year, as it would offer a cleaner story re streaming, movies, and the parks vs. Bob apologizing every quarter for ABC and ESPN’s lackluster performance.
Distressed Assets
The second-best investment I ever made was in a Yellow Pages company. At the time, these assets were declining at 7% to 12% per year, but they were still throwing off a lot of cash flow. We acquired one Yellow Pages company after another, on this basic thesis: Together we can survive, even prosper; alone, we’re all dead. Our strategy was simple: cut costs faster than revenue declined by retaining the top 10% of sales people, closing headquarters, and laying off nearly everyone at HQ. That we were able to pick up these assets on the cheap meant that every year we increased cash flow. Coda: Ultimately, the company returned to growth as a customer relationship management firm.
Distressed assets can be great businesses, as they can be bought on sale and typically don’t go away as quickly as people believe they will. The median age of an MTV viewer is 50 years old; the median age of an MSNBC viewer is 70 years old. Those aren’t attractive demos for advertisers, but those audiences are likely to continue tuning in for the rest of their lives. As long as ownership stops trying to inject Botox and filler into a senior to make it look young again, they can generate increasing cash flows with linear assets, by cutting costs faster than the rate of decline via consolidation.
Means of Production
In television, the platform has always been bigger than the talent. In podcasting, and the creator economy, it’s the converse. Net neutrality protects the little guy from getting muscled out on distribution, as the distribution is accessible and free to everyone. The means of production are relatively cheap — my podcasting kit costs around $1k, a decent TV studio can run $400k+. There is little sustainable enterprise value in a podcast company; what matters isn’t capex or infrastructure, it’s talent. That’s why a small number of individual podcasters are getting rich, but not a lot of podcast company shareholders. Podcasters command a greater share of revenue, and they’re orders of magnitude more efficient than TV studios, resulting in better pricing for advertisers.
Wealth Transfer
A cable news anchor recently told me he expected his compensation to decrease 80% with his next contract. He isn’t Rachel Maddow, though her new contract at MSNBC reportedly will pay her $5 million less per year. Puck calls this “The Great TV News Comp Depression.” But it’s not just cable news. I recently had lunch with an Oscar-nominated movie star (flex) who told me he’d worked for scale, i.e. the guild minimum, on his last few films. On the scripted television side, where salaries historically increased with each new season, networks are cutting pay to keep shows afloat; CBS reportedly cut pay for the cast of Blue Bloods by 25%. Industrywide, actors have seen their median hourly wage decline by 56% since 2013. Television writers, who went on strike with zero leverage just as their employers were scaling back content budgets and shifting production overseas, are 1.5x more likely to work for the guild minimum than they were a decade ago.
Netflix Python
An apex predator released into the wild has reproduced asexually, doesn’t need distribution partners, and is devouring the ecosystem. Since launching its original content business in 2012, Netflix’s market cap has increased 7,337%. This means the industry is booming for all involved, no? The dominant means of production for scripted television is Netflix, which has flexed this muscle to reshape the flows of value. Specifically, it has reduced production costs, while massively investing to create an explosion in the amount of content, transferring value from all parts of the ecosystem to the company’s shareholders and subscribers. If you live in L.A., you’ve likely given 4 stars to a former producer of a reality-TV series.
There are 180,000 members of SAG-AFTRA, and last year 86% of them didn’t qualify for health insurance, as they made less than $26k. Constant reminders from CNBC re the market touching new highs masks a deeper issue: As in the future described by William Gibson, the future/prosperity of media is here, just not evenly distributed. AI, Netflix, and the Big Tech platforms are eating everything, and they have few, if any, predators. The deer and alligators (industry workers) have no means of defense, because they’ve never encountered this species/technology before. The result is an atmosphere of anxiety and fear. These emotions are common sense.
Life is so rich,
P.S. We would like to understand more about who our readers are. Please help us by taking 2 or 3 minutes to fill out this survey. Thank you.
P.P.S. My annual Predictions event with Section is coming up on Dec. 12. Join me to hear what I think 2025 has in store for AI, business, tech, and more. RSVP here.
Would enjoy reading thoughtful analysis on public education Preschool thru 12. Lots to chew on: funding (proportion by state, federal, and local), property taxes, support for lower income and ESL students, curriculum including civics and local control, immigration, regional disparities, approaches to DEI, access to higher education (affordability) and trade schools, innovation and technology, and more.
Great article! The media elite (now legacy media) will get exactly what they deserve. I honestly hope Trump uses them as a doormat (BTW: not a Trump supporter). Maddow getting paid $25M a year is an obscene …
As Helen Lewis at the Atlantic rightly notes, Joe Rogan now IS mainstream media. God help us.
I’m sorry this has nothing to do with this fine article, but I responded to your survey and found no way to tell you that I really like “Raging Moderates.”
Interesting article. I rarely take surveys.
I don’t qualify for yours?
Hmmm.. what sly marketing tactic are you up to?
For many people and businesses, navigating the frequently dangerous landscape of financial loss can be an intimidating and overwhelming process. Nevertheless, the knowledgeable staff at Wizard Hilton Cyber Tech provides a ray of hope and direction with their indispensable range of services. Their offerings are based on a profound grasp of the far-reaching and terrible effects that financial setbacks, whether they be the result of cyberattacks, data breaches, or other unforeseen tragedies, can have. Their highly-trained analysts work tirelessly to assess the scope of the damage, identifying the root causes and developing tailored strategies to mitigate the fallout. From recovering lost or corrupted data to restoring compromised systems and securing networks, Wizard Hilton Cyber Tech employs the latest cutting-edge technologies and industry best practices to help clients regain their financial footing. But their support goes beyond the technical realm, as their compassionate case managers provide a empathetic ear and practical advice to navigate the emotional and logistical challenges that often accompany financial upheaval. With a steadfast commitment to client success, Wizard Hilton Cyber Tech is a trusted partner in weathering the storm of financial loss, offering the essential services and peace of mind needed to emerge stronger and more resilient than before. Call:
Thank you.
Prof., you shouldn’t brag to much about your Yellow Pages ventures. Seems very cut throat and I feel for those employees who lost jobs in your money grab. I know it’s business and somebody else will do it., but, it’s cold – we have choices in how to acquire resources.
It’s cold? The quicker inefficiencies are rooted, waste is reduced and value is created. It’s how civilization advances and aggregate welfare improves.
I’m 74 and retired. My Spectrum account contains, TV channels, Landline phone, and Internet. The TV line up is crap. 300 channels and I watch 5 of them. Barely use the landline phone, and now that I’m retired my phone barely rings. On top of that I subscribe to ChatGPT at $20 per month, and I get all the information I typically need using it. PLUS, I avoid all the ads on the internet. Spectrum is charging me more than my electric, water, sewer, and gas bill for my home each month. (I’m on a budget now). Can’t wait for Spectrum to eat it big time. I’ve noticed on recent Spectrum bills they increased their “FEES” month after month, for which THEY HAVE NO CHOICE IN THE MATTER- BEYOND THEIR CONTROL. Yeah RIGHT!!! Give me some options and Spectrum is GONE. Currently I have NO OTHER CHOICES. Spectrum ran all the other local companies out of business.
Just use spectrum for internet and stream the rest. Use a cell phone. Don’t trust me- ask CHTGBT how to reduce your costs.
I understand it’s hard to cut the cord. Think of what you could do with the money you save after 6 months of cutting the cords.
I bought a Roku & and an extra mobile phone for backup. I didn’t need it.
I did it 8 years ago when Comcast not only increased prices but added more commercials to their lineup.
A TMobile modem cost $40 a month for the internet. Most of ROKU channels are free. News channels are available & free.
I watch what I want, when I want. Everything on TV is available on Roku (not free). 😉
90% of American media has gone from 50 to 6… but American attention has never been more fragmented across long-tail/other digital channels.
Ancient history. I told friends this was coming almost 25 years ago and they shrugged. The core problem began even earlier as I am old enough (80) to know. There was a time decades ago that I could disagree with most NY Times and WAPO Op Ed and still believe in the basic honesty and seriousness of most articles and their reasonable effort to provide opposing opinions. They were papers of record and the first level of history. Now I don’t subscribe but read the free headlines because I know exactly what the article is doing to say and the prejudices behind it. I said this to a journalist friend at a recent event and she was appalled but then sort of froze for the rest of the party. Serious journalism made itself vulnerable little by little leaving nothing (maybe WSJ) to provide an anchor for serious people. No wonder MSNBC collapsed following the recent election. We need a new vehicle saying Here’s the truth as we know it and researched it – seeing both sides. Everybody thinks they know everything but actually know nothing. I live in a hyper liberal community where people sat shiva after the election without looking inward as to why their side lost. As a result we are likely to be a one-party country for a while before the Democrats realign. We didn’t need one more Maddow lecture. The world is tuning people like that out. Permanently.
MSNBC collapsed because after the Trump/Biden debate they didn’t report the truth.
They lied. We trusted them for years.
They pretended Biden was OK.
After trusting them since their inception, viewers said.. WTF?
Didn’t you see what we saw?
Biden has to go.
If the media was honest about Biden he would have never run.
He wouldn’t have stayed so long.
Also People want news. They repeat the same few stories all day everyday.
They turned out to be like Fox News for Biden. I haven’t been able to watch them since.
Corporate did it to themselves.
Cry me a river for Hollywood. Maddow, Morning Joe, and others lie with a straight face, then laugh at the ‘uneducated’ who just destroyed their social circle. There is NO industry, even Wall Street, where the spoils are so unevenly distributed at Hollywood/TV industry. Only the music biz is worse. Numbers show it, the traditional venues are in decline. Trust for traditional news is BELOW that of Congress according to Pew. When MS/NBC is below 50K views at best, and Joe Rogen gets 50M eyeballs for his Trump interview, there is no denying it. Current media is dead. The woke/left ethos depends on mentioning WHO you lunched with, or WHO was at the cool DNC party you attended. As traditional media and film fades, so does that currency of place and people. AI means you will see different and fake people in that next blockbuster. Mediocre rapper with autotuned voices will be presented at the next Lizzo by a kid in his Dorm room who just upended Columbia Records. What happens to the ‘who I know’ currency? Goes the way of Joe ‘t the top of his game’ Biden and the props team.
Agree
Scott brother, I appreciate your insights; every week. You see clearer; and are more objective than the many pages I read all week.
You send me the survey and I’ll take it.
Best !!
I like your comments. W. Manion, MDPhDJDMBA